<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sweden Develops First-Ever Stealth Ships</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gearcrave.com/2009-02-06/sweden-develops-first-ever-stealth-ships/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gearcrave.com/2009-02-06/sweden-develops-first-ever-stealth-ships/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 16:05:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://gearcrave.com/2009-02-06/sweden-develops-first-ever-stealth-ships/comment-page-1/#comment-34999</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 21:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearcrave.com/?p=12159#comment-34999</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d love to see em get some Somali pirates in their sights though.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;d love to see em get some Somali pirates in their sights though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Patton</title>
		<link>http://gearcrave.com/2009-02-06/sweden-develops-first-ever-stealth-ships/comment-page-1/#comment-34981</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Patton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 22:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearcrave.com/?p=12159#comment-34981</guid>
		<description>As an ex-submariner, I have to quote what we bubble-heads would say about this, 
&quot;There are two kinds of ships, submarines, and targets.&quot; The surface boys might not find it,  
but if its out there, its already on the menu. Good luck skimmers, fast attacks would use it for a snack. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an ex-submariner, I have to quote what we bubble-heads would say about this,<br />
&quot;There are two kinds of ships, submarines, and targets.&quot; The surface boys might not find it,<br />
but if its out there, its already on the menu. Good luck skimmers, fast attacks would use it for a snack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl</title>
		<link>http://gearcrave.com/2009-02-06/sweden-develops-first-ever-stealth-ships/comment-page-1/#comment-34976</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 13:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearcrave.com/?p=12159#comment-34976</guid>
		<description>Awesome ships! Though as several other have pointed out, not the first stealth.  Norway also have some kickass so-called &quot;MTBs&quot; - Motor Torpedo Boats.  
 
The new class is, to the best of my knowledge, are stealth. In fact so good that USA borrowed one for a long period. 
 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mil.no/sjo/nye_mtber/start/;jsessionid=YHUGCNJBG1PSFQFIZYGSFEQ?_requestid=59866&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.mil.no/sjo/nye_mtber/start/;jsessionid...&lt;/a&gt; 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome ships! Though as several other have pointed out, not the first stealth.  Norway also have some kickass so-called &quot;MTBs&quot; &#8211; Motor Torpedo Boats.  </p>
<p>The new class is, to the best of my knowledge, are stealth. In fact so good that USA borrowed one for a long period. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.mil.no/sjo/nye_mtber/start/;jsessionid=YHUGCNJBG1PSFQFIZYGSFEQ?_requestid=59866" target="_blank">http://www.mil.no/sjo/nye_mtber/start/;jsessionid&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoalieLax</title>
		<link>http://gearcrave.com/2009-02-06/sweden-develops-first-ever-stealth-ships/comment-page-1/#comment-34972</link>
		<dc:creator>GoalieLax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 05:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearcrave.com/?p=12159#comment-34972</guid>
		<description>the navy still uses that ship.  it&#039;s how they developed the stealth technology in the Arleigh Burke class destroyers and the LPD-17 amphibs. 
 
they can hunt subs using passive sonar...the sonar that is ues the majority of the time...in my 2 1/2 years at sea on a burke-class we rarely used active sonar in sub hunting exercises 
 
ps - i&#039;d like to see how the stealth stacks up against the SPY-1D </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the navy still uses that ship.  it&#039;s how they developed the stealth technology in the Arleigh Burke class destroyers and the LPD-17 amphibs. </p>
<p>they can hunt subs using passive sonar&#8230;the sonar that is ues the majority of the time&#8230;in my 2 1/2 years at sea on a burke-class we rarely used active sonar in sub hunting exercises </p>
<p>ps &#8211; i&#039;d like to see how the stealth stacks up against the SPY-1D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://gearcrave.com/2009-02-06/sweden-develops-first-ever-stealth-ships/comment-page-1/#comment-34967</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 18:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearcrave.com/?p=12159#comment-34967</guid>
		<description>US Navy had a prototype stealth ship in the 80s which was the inspiration for the ship in a bond movie (basically a copy of the US model).   
 
These ships also wouldn&#039;t be able to hunt subs silently as their sonar would be detectable. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>US Navy had a prototype stealth ship in the 80s which was the inspiration for the ship in a bond movie (basically a copy of the US model).   </p>
<p>These ships also wouldn&#039;t be able to hunt subs silently as their sonar would be detectable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luther</title>
		<link>http://gearcrave.com/2009-02-06/sweden-develops-first-ever-stealth-ships/comment-page-1/#comment-34965</link>
		<dc:creator>Luther</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 15:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearcrave.com/?p=12159#comment-34965</guid>
		<description>Note: These are the first stealth ships for actual combat use. The US military created a stealth vessel known as the Sea Shadow in the mid eighties for experimental purposes. 
None the less, these thing are awesome. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note: These are the first stealth ships for actual combat use. The US military created a stealth vessel known as the Sea Shadow in the mid eighties for experimental purposes.<br />
None the less, these thing are awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenneth H.</title>
		<link>http://gearcrave.com/2009-02-06/sweden-develops-first-ever-stealth-ships/comment-page-1/#comment-34958</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 11:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearcrave.com/?p=12159#comment-34958</guid>
		<description>when your referring to ships to get an adequate range in relation to current radar capabilities you really should be using Nautical Miles anyways, i do this stuff every day, Go US NAVY!  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when your referring to ships to get an adequate range in relation to current radar capabilities you really should be using Nautical Miles anyways, i do this stuff every day, Go US NAVY!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam T</title>
		<link>http://gearcrave.com/2009-02-06/sweden-develops-first-ever-stealth-ships/comment-page-1/#comment-34955</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 03:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearcrave.com/?p=12159#comment-34955</guid>
		<description>You may want to check your decimal places on your km-to-mile conversions.  13km does not equal 0.8 miles.... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may want to check your decimal places on your km-to-mile conversions.  13km does not equal 0.8 miles&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elvis</title>
		<link>http://gearcrave.com/2009-02-06/sweden-develops-first-ever-stealth-ships/comment-page-1/#comment-34954</link>
		<dc:creator>elvis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 03:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearcrave.com/?p=12159#comment-34954</guid>
		<description>Your distance conversions are off.   
 
13 km = 8 mi 
22 km = 13.7 mi 
 
Those really are badass lookin&#039; boats. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your distance conversions are off.   </p>
<p>13 km = 8 mi<br />
22 km = 13.7 mi </p>
<p>Those really are badass lookin&#039; boats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://gearcrave.com/2009-02-06/sweden-develops-first-ever-stealth-ships/comment-page-1/#comment-34944</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 21:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearcrave.com/?p=12159#comment-34944</guid>
		<description>Holy crap that&#039;s awesome.  I hope those Somali pirates don&#039;t get their hands on these puppies </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy crap that&#039;s awesome.  I hope those Somali pirates don&#039;t get their hands on these puppies</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 14/26 queries in 0.014 seconds using apc
Content Delivery Network via gearcrave.frsucrave.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: gearcrave.com @ 2012-05-25 08:14:46 -->
