<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Philips shows off a television with a 21:9 aspect ratio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gearcrave.com/2009-01-16/philips-shows-off-a-television-with-a-129-aspect-ratio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gearcrave.com/2009-01-16/philips-shows-off-a-television-with-a-129-aspect-ratio/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 16:05:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Phog</title>
		<link>http://gearcrave.com/2009-01-16/philips-shows-off-a-television-with-a-129-aspect-ratio/comment-page-1/#comment-34356</link>
		<dc:creator>Phog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 21:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearcrave.com/?p=11041#comment-34356</guid>
		<description>Your headline is ironic and probably accidental. 12:9 is equivalent to 4:3 which is what all the &quot;old&quot; TVs use. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your headline is ironic and probably accidental. 12:9 is equivalent to 4:3 which is what all the &quot;old&quot; TVs use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 10/16 queries in 0.010 seconds using apc
Content Delivery Network via gearcrave.frsucrave.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: gearcrave.com @ 2012-05-25 09:04:46 -->
