<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: 2009 Lamborghini Gallardo</title> <atom:link href="http://gearcrave.com/2008-08-05/2009-lamborghini-gallardo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://gearcrave.com/2008-08-05/2009-lamborghini-gallardo/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:29:22 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: V</title><link>http://gearcrave.com/2008-08-05/2009-lamborghini-gallardo/comment-page-1/#comment-23579</link> <dc:creator>V</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:06:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearcrave.com/?p=4056#comment-23579</guid> <description>Hello...So it&#039;s you, who gave Dodge its distinct appearence during the second gen phase?Well, then...pardon me if I seem to &quot;gush&quot;. As far as I am concerned, you&#039;re pretty awesome. Your eye for beauty is of worthy note. I hope it&#039;s not inappropriate to mention this here.It is you whom I must thank, for coming up with what must be one of the most aesthetically pleasing vehicles I&#039;ve had the pleasure to enjoy. (I don&#039;t see a great deal of &quot;beautiful&quot; trucks out there...lately, most of them are...well, &#039;bubble-looking&#039;. The closest to a good looking truck is the heavy duty Fords--because they most closely resemble a Dodge-Breed!)I also find it interesting that you have had your hand in on the Legend...the &#039;65 mustang. That car was something special!I have to wonder what you were motivated by in the design. Were you instructed specifically to &quot;make them look like a &#039;Big Rig&#039; &quot;, or was this a concept of your own inspiration?It&#039;s been my great blessing to be able to get a 2001 Dodge Ram, as it&#039;s the end of a time when these trucks were their most fetching. Sadly, when they designed the third gen of Rams, they fell short of the mark and I figured I&#039;d better get a good one before they vanished.It is so rare to see someone&#039;s eye for beauty translated in the design of a vehicle now a days...usually you have to look into the more upscale vehicles to see real license and innovation.Thanks for your contributon...it is in my opinion, a standard other trucks will try--and fail---to emulate.To the web master...again, I hope this isn&#039;t an ill-placed contribution to this forum.Thanks for your time!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello&#8230;</p><p>So it&#8217;s you, who gave Dodge its distinct appearence during the second gen phase?</p><p>Well, then&#8230;pardon me if I seem to &#8220;gush&#8221;. As far as I am concerned, you&#8217;re pretty awesome. Your eye for beauty is of worthy note. I hope it&#8217;s not inappropriate to mention this here.</p><p>It is you whom I must thank, for coming up with what must be one of the most aesthetically pleasing vehicles I&#8217;ve had the pleasure to enjoy. (I don&#8217;t see a great deal of &#8220;beautiful&#8221; trucks out there&#8230;lately, most of them are&#8230;well, &#8216;bubble-looking&#8217;. The closest to a good looking truck is the heavy duty Fords&#8211;because they most closely resemble a Dodge-Breed!)</p><p>I also find it interesting that you have had your hand in on the Legend&#8230;the &#8216;65 mustang. That car was something special!</p><p>I have to wonder what you were motivated by in the design. Were you instructed specifically to &#8220;make them look like a &#8216;Big Rig&#8217; &#8220;, or was this a concept of your own inspiration?</p><p>It&#8217;s been my great blessing to be able to get a 2001 Dodge Ram, as it&#8217;s the end of a time when these trucks were their most fetching. Sadly, when they designed the third gen of Rams, they fell short of the mark and I figured I&#8217;d better get a good one before they vanished.</p><p>It is so rare to see someone&#8217;s eye for beauty translated in the design of a vehicle now a days&#8230;usually you have to look into the more upscale vehicles to see real license and innovation.</p><p>Thanks for your contributon&#8230;it is in my opinion, a standard other trucks will try&#8211;and fail&#8212;to emulate.</p><p>To the web master&#8230;again, I hope this isn&#8217;t an ill-placed contribution to this forum.</p><p>Thanks for your time!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Phillip E. Payne</title><link>http://gearcrave.com/2008-08-05/2009-lamborghini-gallardo/comment-page-1/#comment-10659</link> <dc:creator>Phillip E. Payne</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 21:24:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearcrave.com/?p=4056#comment-10659</guid> <description>Lamborghini has offered consistently interesting styling designs in their products.However, this latest version suffers of the same illness as most previous issues:Failure to understand the &quot;swept line&quot; and proper surface flow /surface development from one segment to another.  Highlight control is a bit weak.  Bodyside and ends graphics appear &quot;forced&quot;.All of this is &quot;styling designer speak&quot; which was my career for just over 40 years.  I cut my teeth working on the &#039;65 Mustang at Ford and ended my career heading up the design for the &#039;94 Dodge Ram Pick-up at Chrysler.With this &quot;justification&quot; of my experience, whether you like those designs or not, I find the Lamborghinis fails to get he unnecessary blunt intersects of surfaces properly resolved.  A little more finesse and the Lamborghini would blow away any other Italian sports car (you know who I mean).Phillip E. Payne</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lamborghini has offered consistently interesting styling designs in their products.</p><p>However, this latest version suffers of the same illness as most previous issues:</p><p>Failure to understand the &#8220;swept line&#8221; and proper surface flow /surface development from one segment to another.  Highlight control is a bit weak.  Bodyside and ends graphics appear &#8220;forced&#8221;.</p><p>All of this is &#8220;styling designer speak&#8221; which was my career for just over 40 years.  I cut my teeth working on the &#8216;65 Mustang at Ford and ended my career heading up the design for the &#8216;94 Dodge Ram Pick-up at Chrysler.</p><p>With this &#8220;justification&#8221; of my experience, whether you like those designs or not, I find the Lamborghinis fails to get he unnecessary blunt intersects of surfaces properly resolved.  A little more finesse and the Lamborghini would blow away any other Italian sports car (you know who I mean).</p><p>Phillip E. Payne</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 12/19 queries in 0.004 seconds using apc
Content Delivery Network via gearcrave.frsucrave.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: gearcrave.com @ 2010-03-22 00:25:15 -->